The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago has reversed a district court judge’s decision in a case involving an indemnification clause in a contract.
Robert Krien was an employee of Riley Construction. Riley was the general contractor on a construction project located in Wisconsin. Riley in turn, hired Harsco Corporation to supply the scaffolding for the construction work. Krien was injured when he fell from the scaffolding after a plank broke beneath him. The parties settled Krien’s injury claim for $900,000.
Before the settlement, Harsco had filed a third-party complaint against Riley seeking indemnification for any damages Harsco might pay by way of judgment or settlement. Then the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, and the district court judge granted Riley’s motion. Harsco took this appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals in Chicago.